Showing posts with label art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label art. Show all posts

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Jean Clottes' Cave Art

I checked this book out from the library on a recommendation from the Slate Spoiler Specials podcast on Herzog's documentary, Cave of Forgotten Dreams (which is as amazing and overpowering as the critics say, see it in 3D.) I wanted to write down just a few of the things I learned from the book.

Jean Clottes has written several books on caving, including some on Chauvet Cave (the subject of the Herzog film.) He is a world expert on paleolithic cave art and has a small appearance in the movie-alas, he's not the guy in the animal pelt playing the Star Spangled Banner on a bone flute. That guy ruled.

Here is a picture of Jean Clottes in Chauvet:







Paleolithic cultures are named for the French sites where they were first discovered. 95% of documented cave art is in France and Spain.

Cave art is a characteristic of the Upper Paleolithic (45,000-10,000 BC) and may be divided up as follows:


  • Aurignacian culture (Wikipedia has different dates than Clottes. I'm just going to use his): 35,000+-28,000 years ago. This is the age of Chauvet (Ardeche, France.) Named after the Aurignac site.
  • Gravettian culture: 28,000-22,000 years ago. The "Venus" portable figures become popular during this era. Clottes also says that "Venus" isn't really the correct name. Named after La Gravette in Dordogne.
  • Solutrean culture: 22,000-17,000 years ago. This is the age of Lascaux (Dordogne, France.) Named for the Solutre site in Saone-et-Loire. Solutrean art appears to mostly in France and Spain.
  • Magdalenian culture: 17,000-11,000 years ago. Named after the La Madeleine in Dordogne. This is the age of Niaux (Ariege, France.)
To improve adhesion to the walls, the pigment was sometimes mixed with stone powder called extender.

Aurignacians and all of their successors are homo sapiens sapiens.

Friday, May 27, 2011

From the Iron Age to a clock that eats time

Some various stuff I learned from podcasts this week--

On the BBC's "In Our Time", Melvyn and guests discussed the beginning of the Iron Age in Europe and what it meant. It's difficult to pin these types of dates down (this is especially true for the Bronze Age) as they aren't homogenous even within Europe. It began between ~1200 and 1000 BC in Europe (around a century earlier in the Near East.) It followed a period called the Bronze Age Collapse, which was caused by the collapse of some Near Eastern kingdoms like the Hittites and the disruption of Egyptian rule in places like Syria. The importance of trade routes from the making of bronze was that a big source of tin was Afghanistan although it also came from sources closer to home, like the Czech Republic. The trade routes were already in place from such other precious goods as jade. Jadeite hand axes have been found all the way to Scotland. Here is a longer story about why the switch from bronze to iron made sense. Other than the problem of tin supply, bronze is hard to work with. And here is an article on why dates are hard to pin down and sometimes the Iron Age is broken into First and Second.

Guardian Science Weekly had a story about a new clock on display at the British Museum called the Chronophage, or Time-Eater as you can tell from the etymology. It was created by a British engineer and inventor named John Taylor who had previously designed heat elements in electric tea kettles (apparently ~75% of such kettles in England contain his handiwork.)  He was inspired by the work of 18th century British clockmaker John Harrison who was bedeviled by how to make a clock without gears that needed oiling. The oils available at the time were limited and costly and/or inappropriate. Goose grease, for instance, freezes rock solid when it gets cold.

Taylor's clock was inspired by the escapement (the source of the ticking sound) in an old clock of Harrison's. Taylor meant it both as an homage to Harrison and to remind people that their time is ticking away. Here is a video of the sister clock at Corpus Library, Cambridge. Here is what just the escapement looks like:


You can clearly hear it plugging away in the video although the grasshopper on this one (this is the Science Museum version) looks a little less scary. And also looks more like a fly.

Finally, I listened to an episode of To the Best of Our Knowledge called "Nature Stories" and the whole episode was good. A scientist called David Rothenberg recorded himself playing the clarinet in a duet with some humpback whales who responded to the music. They can respond to new sounds much more agilely than birds. I also didn't know that only male whales sing, although it's no longer clear that it's for mating purposes as was first thought.

Next was an artist called Jennifer Angus who collects insects to use in her artwork, large scale mural-like installations. Some people are disgusted, some are disgusted and intrigued and at least one said it was wrong of her to cause the insects to die for her art. She says she sees them as ambassadors for their species. One thing the audio program couldn't do was show me what her art looked like so here's a link to the Google image search and an example:






Nature writer Anne Fadiman talked about how she and her brother enjoyed collecting and killing butterflies as children. She said it didn't dawn on her immediately she was killing them (or rather, the implications of killing them) but she said they were horrified when it dawned on them. She said it must be what hunters feel like, to own a piece of nature.

Finally, Christopher Benfrey, an English professor, wrote a book about how New England went hummingbird crazy in the 19th century. This includes writers from Emily Dickinson to Mark Twain. There was also a painter named Martin Johnson Heade (pronounced "heed") who painted them. They said his paintings were really color saturated, almost impressionistic. I was curious:


 Wow! You can see this in person at the National Gallery in Washington.

He says that Emily Dickinson often mentioned hummingbirds in her letters and how reading was akin to their actions except the reader "sips words." The interviewer asked if that wasn't appropriate since her poetry had a hummingbird-like quality.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Picasso and Marie Therese

So according to the Leonard Lopate Show there is a new Picasso exhibit in NYC. It's kind of unusual because it's at a gallery rather than a museum. Picasso's family assisted in the curation.The theme of the show is Picasso's one-time muse, Marie Therese. He approached her on a Paris street when she was 17 and asked if he could paint her. She didn't know who he was.

Picasso isn't one of my favorite painters. I'm not super jazzed about cubism for the most part. I like his blue period much better. I was curious about Marie Therese though. Here is probably one of his most famous paintings of her:


The image on the left is Marie Therese. Here is some more info about her. These images have never been assembled and shown this way. There are also some rare photographs of her. I like this painting here, softer than his usual stuff. It reminds me a bit of Tamara Lempicka.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Philomathia: Lee Krasner

The Leonard Lopate Show had Gail Levin on who just wrote a new biography of Lee Krasner. Since I learned virtually everything I know about her from the Pollock movie, I'm glad someone restored this woman to her rightful place in the art world. She was an Abstract Expressionist herself, as Levin learned when she went to interview her about Pollock's legacy years ago and this she only found out because the gallery owner that was hosting the interview said, "You know, she's a painter too." She is best known for the 14 year period of her life she spent with Pollock and then for being a fierce protector of his legacy after he died in 1956. But her paintings are well regarded in the art world and do fetch high prices at auction-although, far less than Pollock's of course. Biography has a short piece about her here and here is a picture of Pollock and Krasner together, accompanied by a story about how artist/wives get short shrift in general (although there are big exceptions like Georgia O'Keefe and Frida Kahlo and since Krasner spent so much time promoting Pollock's legacy, perhaps this was partly inevitable.)

So one of the things I thought was interesting was Lopate mentioned he didn't want to get into the circumstances of Pollock's death (drunk driving accident that also killed a passenger) because his girlfriend Ruth Kligman who was also a passenger in the car at the time had been on the show. I remember her from the movie where she was played by Jennifer Connelly and which did not portray her in a flattering light. Apparently, she was a figure in the art world herself although it's debatable as to how much of that is because of her predilection for dating famous artists. She seemed to hook up with a lot of artists (Pollock of course, De Kooning, Jasper Johns, and she claimed Andy Warhol had a crush on her which, yeah ok.) And she was a painter herself-she has a website with a cross-section of her work. She died in 2010.

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Epistemophilia: Hans van Meegeren, the fake Christ and art thieves suck

So, while I was in the library the other day, I picked up a book on display about art travel (called Art + Travel) through Europe that actually is really entertaining-and since it's a travel book it has plenty of maps. It provides a lot of information for a travel book and has reproductions on a great number of paintings by Caravaggio, Munch, Van Gogh, Vermeer and Goya. And where to see them.

I wanted to highlight the story of an art forger named Hans Van Meegeren (1889-1947.) He started out as a student of architecture then later tried to become a painter but the Dutch critics weren't very complimentary. He set out to prove the experts wrong and began a career as a forger of Dutch masterpieces, including Vermeer who was from his own home town of Delft. He fooled many art critics and even the Nazis. Goering has one of his fake Vermeers, "Christ and the Adultress" in his collection. And this is how Van Meegeren got in trouble. After the occupation, he was arrested for selling Dutch cultural treasures to the Nazis. To prove his innocence, he painted one of his fakes in court, demonstrating the techniques he used to imitate the Dutch masters and how he made the paint appear aged.

He was given a token sentence of one year for the forgery and became a folk hero among the Dutch for fooling art experts and, even better, the Nazis. Alas, he died of a heart attack before he could serve his sentence.

BTW, the article about Vermeer (my favorite since I love all things Dutch Realism) mentions not much is known about him or his life but he was an admirer of the Dutch painter Carel Fabritius and owned some of his paintings. I don't know him--apparently he was in turn a student of Rembrandt. There is some information about him here.

I'm not the only one who loves Dutch Realism. The most stolen artwork in history is Van Eyck's The Ghent Altarpiece. I remember my art history teacher in college telling us he painted everything to exacting detail using single-haired brushed to get some of the details. You can zoom in and see amazing detail on the crown and the jewels and garments. Seven times it's been stolen and I didn't know this-it weighs 2 TONS. A panel of it is still missing.

A Vermeer was also one of the paintings stolen from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston. The total value of that theft was around $500 million. None of the items have been recovered and also include works by Rembrandt, Degas and Manet.  The going theory now is a faction of the IRA has them. Apparently,  a lot of art is stolen as bargaining items for international crime. WTF, is the IRA still around? People are pigs, as my Mother often says.

(here's something cool about that Museum: if your name is Isabella, you get in free.)